Others have more fluid propositional assignments as adults. Primarily because they have a high threshold to match. These people less frequently alter their propositions later in life. Those that are mostly logically fixed on their basic premises earlier in life– because their neurobiology found many patterns which they could work to success early in life. It is take an A that is possible and act as if it’s a certainty. There is no special A union B probabilistic operation. The logical operations are performed as in normal logic. Fuzzy logic or probabilistic joining of propositions are not performed. Then, often without conscious direction, one sees where the fact leads logically. Instead, a similarity is treated as a fact (pounding into an actuality). The distinction is that similarity does not precede according to logical rules. In casual terms, some might label similarity as probabilistic logic. Not Probabilistic Logic, but Treating Likelihoods as Certainties If several features are the same, then the next thought may occur even though it’s not logically linked. Others, like me, often follow a thread of similarity. Their ideas are predominantly logical linked. The manner in which the thought train is linked varies among people. Meditation, isolation, and quiet story are means we consciously use to extend this predominantly pre-conscious mechanism. The manner by which thought trains become available to our verbal analysis occurs most readily when we seek out a non-interruption and extend our effective thought train length by inventions such as pen and paper and computers to store our intermediate results. Although I’ve used the word “decision,” the thought train is typically pre-conscious thoughts. In the thought train diagram, I’ve focused on the path, the length and the final decision.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |